Wellbeing Impacts with Household Energy Poverty in Cold Climate Settlements: Survey Experiment

Authors

  • Tiffany Chan Department of Applied Science, School of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China Author

Keywords:

Energy Poverty, Subjective Wellbeing, Cold Climates, Survey Experiment, Wellbeing Impacts

Abstract

Energy poverty remains a critical challenge in regions characterized by severe and prolonged cold climates, where maintaining adequate indoor thermal comfort is both a biological necessity and a significant financial burden. While traditional metrics of energy poverty heavily rely on expenditure ratios and income thresholds, there is a growing recognition that the deprivation of domestic energy services yields profound consequences for subjective wellbeing, mental health, and social participation. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the wellbeing impacts of household energy poverty using evidence derived from a rigorously designed survey experiment administered to residents in cold climate settlements. By utilizing hypothetical vignettes that manipulate factors such as energy cost shocks, infrastructural efficiency, and policy support availability, the study isolates the causal mechanisms through which energy insecurity deteriorates psychological health and life satisfaction. The findings reveal that acute exposure to perceived energy insecurity significantly decreases multidimensional wellbeing scores, with the most severe impacts observed among households residing in older, energy-inefficient dwellings. Furthermore, the survey experiment demonstrates that targeted informational treatments regarding available financial assistance mitigate a substantial portion of the anticipated psychological distress. The insights generated from this research emphasize the urgent need for multidimensional policy interventions that address both the structural inefficiencies of housing in cold climates and the psychological burdens borne by vulnerable populations.

References

1. Rehman, A.; Ma, H.; Ahmad, M.; Ozturk, I.; Işık, C. Estimating the Connection of Information Technology, Foreign Direct Investment, Trade, Renewable Energy and Economic Progress in Pakistan: Evidence from ARDL Approach and Cointegrating Regression Analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 50623–50635.

2. Gautam, M.; Laborde, D.; Mamun, A.; Martin, W.; Piñeiro, V.; Vos, R. Repurposing Agricultural Policies and Support: Options to Transform Agriculture and Food Systems to Better Serve the Health of People, Economies, and the Planet; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA; IFPRI: Washington, DC, USA, 2022.

3. Zhao, W.; Toh, M.Y. Impact of innovative city pilot policy on industrial structure upgrading in China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7377.

4. Climate Focus. The Voluntary Carbon Market Dashboard; Climate Focus: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2025; Available online: https://climatefocus.com/initiatives/voluntary-carbon-market-dashboard/ (accessed on 5 November 2025).

5. Climate Focus. The Voluntary Carbon Market: 2024 Review; Climate Focus: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2025; Available online: https://climatefocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Voluntary-Carbon-Market-2024-Review.pdf (accessed on 5 November 2025).

6. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S. The Impacts of GDP, Trade Structure, Exchange Rate and FDI Inflows on China’s Carbon Emissions. Energy Policy 2018, 120, 347–353.

7. Scott, D.; Gössling, S.; Hall, C.M. International tourism and climate change: Impacts, adaptation and mitigation. Rev. Clim. Change 2012, 3, 213–232.

8. Yi, M.; Liu, Y.; Sheng, M.S.; Wen, L. Effects of Digital Economy on Carbon Emission Reduction: New Evidence from China. Energy Policy 2022, 171, 113271.

9. Miltenberger, O.; Jospe, C.; Pittman, J. The good is never perfect: Why the current flaws of voluntary carbon markets are services, not barriers to successful climate change action. Front. Clim. 2021, 3, 130.

10. Börner, J.; Baylis, K.; Corbera, E.; Ezzine-de-Blas, D.; Honey-Rosés, J.; Persson, U.M.; Wunder, S. The effectiveness of payments for environmental services. World Dev. 2017, 96, 359–374.

11. Lucero, L.J.; Gunn, J.D.; Scarborough, V.L. Climate change and Classic Maya water management. Water 2011, 3, 479–494.

12. Butler, R.W. The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution. Can. Geogr. 1980, 24, 5–12.

13. Liu, C.; Jiechang, X. Online Market, Digital Platform and Resource Allocation Efficiency: The Effect of Price Mechanism and Data Mechanism. China Ind. Econ. 2023, 7, 84–102.

14. Hou, J.; Li, M. An Empirical Study on Rural Revitalization Drives Migrant Workers to Return to Their Hometowns: Based on Survey Data of 2,332 Migrant Workers in 26 Provinces. J. Henan Norm. Univ. (Philos. Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2019, 46, 29–36.

15. Principles for Responsible Investment (IPR). Forecast Policy Scenario + Nature (FPS + Nature): Preparing Financial Markets for Climate- and Nature-Related Policy and regulatory Risks; Principles for Responsible Investment: London, UK, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-20

Issue

Section

Articles