Water Productivity with Sustainable Irrigation Technologies and Social Legitimacy across Arid Farming Regions

Authors

  • Sergio Núñez Geography Department, Faculty of Geography and History, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Author
  • Francisco Vicente Geography Department, Faculty of Geography and History, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Author

Keywords:

Water Productivity, Sustainable Irrigation, Social Legitimacy, Arid Agriculture, Arid Farming Regions

Abstract

Water scarcity remains one of the most critical challenges facing global agricultural systems, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions where farming communities rely heavily on diminishing freshwater resources. Enhancing agricultural water productivity is essential for ensuring food security and environmental sustainability. While significant investments have been made in sustainable irrigation technologies, the adoption rates and subsequent productivity gains often fall short of expectations. This paper investigates the complex interplay between sustainable irrigation technologies and social legitimacy in explaining water productivity outcomes in arid farming regions. By synthesizing perspectives from agricultural engineering, rural sociology, and institutional theory, this research proposes that technological efficacy is inherently bounded by the social acceptance and institutional embeddedness of the interventions. We argue that pragmatic, moral, and cognitive dimensions of social legitimacy serve as critical mediating mechanisms that determine how irrigation technologies are implemented, maintained, and optimized by local end-users. The analysis reveals that regions exhibiting high social legitimacy for water conservation policies and technologies consistently demonstrate superior water productivity, regardless of the baseline technological sophistication. This study provides a comprehensive framework for policymakers and resource managers, emphasizing that sustainable agricultural water management requires a paradigm shift from purely technocratic solutions toward integrated approaches that prioritize community engagement, cultural alignment, and institutional trust.

References

1. Laborde, D.; Mamun, A.; Martin, W.; Piñeiro, V.; Vos, R. Agricultural subsidies and global greenhouse gas emissions. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2601.

2. Chong, H.; Sunding, D. Water markets and trading. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2006, 31, 239–264.

3. Grafton, R.Q.; Horne, J.; Wheeler, S.A. Rethinking Water Markets; ORE Environmental Science: Exeter, UK, 2022; Available online: https://oxfordre.com/environmentalscience/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.001.0001/acrefore-9780199389414-e-800 (accessed on 9 October 2025).

4. Chen, Z.; Kahn, M.E.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z. The Consequences of Spatially Differentiated Water Pollution Regulation in China. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2018, 88, 468–485.

5. Wunder, S.; Börner, J.; Ezzine-de-Blas, D.; Feder, S.; Pagiola, S. Payments for environmental services: Past performance and pending potentials. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 2020, 12, 209–234.

6. Barbier, E.B. The Economics of Managing Water Crises. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 2022, 380, 20210295.

7. Brady, J.E.; Prufer, K.M. the Maw of the Earth Monster: Mesoamerican Ritual Cave Use; University of Texas Press: Austin, TX, USA, 2005.

8. World Economic Forum (WEF). Global Risks Report; World Economic Forum: Cologny, Switzerland, 2025; Available online: https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2025/ (accessed on 5 November 2025).

9. Filewod, B.; McCarney, G. Avoiding carbon leakage from nature-based offsets by design. One Earth 2023, 6, 790–802.

10. Maluku Forest. The Maluku Token: Preserving Nature, Empowering Communities, and Innovating for the Future. 2025. Available online: https://malukuforest.com/ (accessed on 5 November 2025).

11. Gallardo, R.K. The environmental impacts of agriculture: A review. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2024, 18, 165–235.

12. Barbier, E.B. Economics for a Fragile Planet; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2022.

13. Zhang, J.H.; Yang, B.; Chen, M. Challenges of the development for automotive parts remanufacturing in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 140, 1087–1094.

14. Kronthal-Sacco, R.; Whelan, T. Sustainable Market Share Index; New York University, Stern School of Business, Center for Sustainable Business: New York, NY, USA, 2024; Available online: https://www.stern.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/2024-05/2024%20CSB%20Report%20for%20website.pdf (accessed on 5 November 2025).

15. Yang, R.; Ge, Y.; Lin, Y. Coordination Mechanism of Comprehensive Land Consolidation and Modernization of Agriculture and Rural Areas. Mod. Urban Res. 2024, 39, 8–16.

16. Bauer-Gottwein, P.; Gondwe, B.R.N.; Charvet, G.; Marín, L.E.; Rebolledo-Vieyra, M.; Merediz-Alonso, G. Review: The Yucatán Peninsula karst aquifer, Mexico. Hydrogeol. J. 2011, 19, 507–524.

17. Liu, X. Mechanism and Path of Promoting Urban-Rural Integration Through Comprehensive Land Improvement in the Whole Region. Nat. Resour. Econ. China 2024, 37, 74–79.

18. Fang, C. Theoretical Analysis on the Mechanism and Evolution Law of Urban-Rural Integration Development. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2022, 77, 759–776.

19. Gao, M.; Zheng, Z. The Theoretical Logic and Practical Approach of Livable, Business-friendly and Beautiful Rural Construction: Based on the Experience and Inspiration of Zhejiang’s “Ten Million Project”. Acad. J. Zhongzhou 2024, 14–22.

20. Jin, C. The Theoretical Basis of Urban-Rural Integrated Development: A Perspective of Wealth Accumulation. Econ. Perspect. 2018, 48–63.

21. Stock, T.; Seliger, G. Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2016, 54, 536–554.

22. European Union (EU). Commission Notice—Guidance Document for Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 on Deforestation-Free Products. 2025. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4524/oj (accessed on 5 November 2025).

23. Kopczynski, S.; Nolen, R.; Hala, D.; Lases-Hernández, F.; Escobedo-Hinojosa, W.; Arcega-Cabrera, F.; Oceguera-Vargas, I.; Quigg, A. Investigation of anthropogenic and emerging contaminants in sinkholes (cenotes) of the Great Mayan Aquifer, Yucatán Peninsula. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2025, 89, 279–299.

24. Crippa, M.; Guizzardi, D.; Pagani, F.; Banja, M.; Muntean, M. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions of All World Countries—2025 Report; Publications Office of the European Union (EU): Luxembourg, 2025; Available online: https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/report_2025 (accessed on 5 November 2025).

25. Wang, M.; Hu, C.; Barnes, B.B.; Mitchum, G.; Lapointe, B.; Montoya, J.P. The great Atlantic Sargassum belt. Science 2019, 365, 83–87.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-23

Issue

Section

Articles